|She makes more than me. WTF! I deserve a raise!!!|
Why would anyone hire men?
If two employees apply to be a manager at Wal-Mart and both have equal levels of education, and years of experience in retail management, but one is willing to work for $30,000 a year and the other won't settle for less then $40,000 a year, who is going to get hired? I won't even patronize you by answering the question. And this works for any company anywhere. Hell it's even more basic than that. If you walked into a store and found a 12-pack of Coke labeled for $3 well the rest were labeled at $4 you would take the $3 box every-time, and so would everyone else.
So explain why any company knowing it only had to pay women 77% of what it pays men, would ever extend the offer to a male. Certainly no company I have ever worked for. My experience: When I worked as a manager I was responsible for maintaining payroll, one way we achieved this was to send employees home early if business was slow. How was I instructed who to send home first? Seeing as all the employees were virtually equally capable at their jobs their was no reason to be biased based on performance.
|it would be like choosing which Olsen twin to sleep with, yeah Mary-Kate is probably the bigger freak but Ashley has the virtue of being less likely to pass out mid fornication.|
|She quit her job, then let the people of Britain pay for her to write those books. Unrelated point, women who own businesses make less then men...they must be sexist too.|
If in fact employers are just sexist and prefer having males employees and don't care about the effect of the bottom line, because they are so overtly chauvinistic, than it should be easy for a non-sexist company to attract the best female talent. At least a few companies, like these, are going to consider women equal to their male counterparts, so if the other companies were unwilling to compete with the offers of these equal pay firms, then they would attract the best female talent.
Considering that female talent is equal to male talent, this would give these firms an advantage over their sexist competitors, who would probably react by offer equal tantalizing salaries to the best female talent, and eventually the whole system would just revert to higher compensation for higher performance, which for arguments sake is the system that male employees already compete in, and which the female employees wish to join. So the free market would take care of this issue by itself. And seeing as their are no government subsidies for hiring male employees, in fact the reverse is true, their should be no reason that the system wouldn't have worked out the kinks by now.
or just watch this video,